Making Sex Work an Honest Business Makes Communities Safer | New York Law Journal

New York Law Journal

COMMENTARY

Making Sex Work an Honest Business Makes Communities Safer

Those of us with the power to defend individuals — or to change laws — should vehemently support the full decriminalization of consensual adult prostitution, a Manhattan civil rights attorney writes.

February 27, 2023 at 11:15 PM
6 minute read
Commentary
By Cary London | February 27, 2023 at 11:15 PM

The decriminalization of sex work is an unexpected, hot-button legal issue for 2023.

As a civil rights attorney with a background in public defense, I have seen the impact of systemic abuse on those who are the most vulnerable — sex workers. Sex work, a broad umbrella term that encompasses all forms of erotic labor, has and will always continue to exist.

Those of us with the power to defend individuals — or to change laws — should vehemently support the full decriminalization of consensual adult prostitution. Prohibition does not work. It makes people’s lives more dangerous.

From the personal costs (arrest, violence, stigma) to the public (taxes, police resources, court resources), it is time for New York to take its place as a progressive leader and decriminalize prostitution.

Decrim NY, a coalition of advocates and organizations, is lobbying this week Albany in support of Senate Bill S.4396, which is sponsored by State Sen. Julia Salazar, D-Brooklyn.

What I have witnessed on a day-to-day basis in court — that criminalization is immensely harmful — is supported by research. Data from around the world shows that the decriminalization of prostitution increases public health and safety and reduces trafficking and exploitation. The World Health Organization, Amnesty International and the ACLU are just some of the organizations calling for decriminalization.

Go after the John or the Jane? Opponents of decriminalization argue that removing criminal penalties for buying and selling sex will allow traffickers to act with impunity — the data shows this is simply not the case.

Even more absurd is the theory that the commercial sex industry can be abolished through a policy framework commonly referred to as the “End Demand Model,” the “Entrapment Model,” the “Nordic Model” and, in New York, the “Equality Model.”

This policy, currently making its way through the New York State Legislature (Senate Bill S.1352, sponsored by State Sen. Liz Krueger, D-Manhattan) removes criminal penalties for selling sex, but not for buying. Data from countries where this model has been introduced prove its failure to increase public health and safety and to decrease trafficking.

In Norway, after the Entrapment Model was implemented, sex workers reported higher levels of anxiety and unease, as well as increased stigmatization and have been subject to heightened rates of anti-social and nuisance behavior.

Compelling data compiled by national advocacy organization Decriminalize Sex Work (DSW) shows the urgent need to decriminalize both the buying and selling of sex in New York.

In “By the Numbers: New York’s Treatment of Sex Workers and Trafficking Survivors,” DSW sought to determine the efficacy and social costs of policing prostitution by examining trends in arrest and conviction rates for both prostitution and human trafficking offenses in New York State.

One of the publication’s primary conclusions is the imminent need to decriminalize sex work in New York State and around the country. While New York has made critical reforms in its treatment of sex workers and human trafficking survivors in recent decades, chief among them the repeal of Penal Law Section 240.37 criminalizing loitering for the purpose of engaging in a prostitution offense and the expansion of vacatur eligibility for survivors of human trafficking, the stigmatization and marginalization of sex workers persists with detrimental effects for the health and safety of entire communities.

Sex workers and service providers agree that the decriminalization of consensual, adult sex work is the only way to dismantle the institutional oppression of these communities and combat stigma and exploitation in commercial sex. The data reveals that, though arrest rates for prostitution and related crimes are declining, those arrests have seemingly shifted to people working at unlicensed massage parlors, locations the New York City Police Department’s Vice Squad regularly raid as a result of anti-Asian bias and discrimination.

Only in recent years have the number of arrests for purchasing or aiding prostitution come close to arrests for solicitation offenses. The most damaging impacts of criminalization are felt by the communities with the greatest vulnerability. DSW’s analysis demonstrates that, even if arrest and conviction rates are slowing, racial and gender biases are as strong as ever. 98% and 97% of New York City arrests in 2019 for prostitution and loitering for the purpose of engaging in prostitution, respectively, were of female-identified individuals.

Similarly, 91% and 93% were people of color. Even more severe, in the past 10 years, 90% of arrests for patronizing a prostitute in the third degree were Black, indigenous and people of color — despite the fact that national studies report between 80-85% of sex buyers are white men.

Convictions showed similar bias. Over the last decade, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office has taken critical steps to recognize sex worker rights. In April 2021, former District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. announced that his office would no longer prosecute prostitution or unlicensed massage, a statute used largely to arrest East Asian immigrants working in the massage business.

Last year, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced that prostitution is among the charges his office will no longer prosecute. Though fewer arrests and these DA policies may present a rosy picture, alarming trends, including heightened arrests of Asian immigrant women in massage parlors and widespread corruption and violence by NYPD Vice squad continue.

ProPublica reported that “…cops often earned overtime for making these [prostitution related arrests], giving them a financial incentive to arrest as many people as possible. And there was no real check on the conduct of the officers. In those rare cases when defense attorneys challenged the arrest, cases were often dropped, keeping the undercover cop’s identity and tactics secret.” Further, the city and state lack a cohesive, consistent approach, leaving a patchwork of justice that is woefully uneven.

Senate Bill S.4396 is supported by sex workers, public health researchers and human rights advocates and would repeal laws criminalizing consensual adult sex work, grounding our policies in data and promoting equal treatment under the law for all New Yorkers.

Make an honest business out of sex work — and our communities will be safer.

Cary London is the managing partner of civil rights at Shulman & Hill.

United States Appeals Court Hears Arguments Against SESTA/FOSTA

January 11, 2023

The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA) and Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) have harmed victims of trafficking, the very individuals they were meant to protect, along with sex workers across the United States since they became law in 2018. For the past five years, human rights advocates, sex workers, and even law enforcement have worked hard to oppose SESTA/FOSTA.

Earlier this month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard arguments challenging SESTA/FOSTA from the Woodhull Freedom Foundation, the Internet Archive, Human Rights Watch, massage therapist Eric Koszyk, and sex worker rights activist Jesse Maley, who filed suit as a group against the United States on the basis that the law is unconstitutional.

The group of plaintiffs filed its initial case in 2018 and has experienced a frustrating back-and-forth since then. After a series of dismissals and appeals, a panel of three appellate judges finally heard oral arguments at the D.C. Circuit Court on January 11, 2023.

SESTA/FOSTA amends Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which protects internet service providers from being held responsible for the actions of their users. SESTA/FOSTA makes it a federal crime to “own, manage, or operate an interactive computer service” with “the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person.” This creates an exception to Section 230 by holding platforms liable for content posted by their users that could be perceived as promoting the prostitution of others. State law enforcement can prosecute these cases at their discretion.

Unable to bear this new criminal and civil liability, many platforms have censored user content, and many users self-censored their content to avoid being de-platformed. One of the most prominent examples of this happened when Craigslist shut down its Therapeutic Services page, leaving people like massage therapist Eric Koszyk, a plaintiff in this case, without a means of advertising, screening clients, and scheduling appointments online.

It’s important to note that sex workers also use online platforms to create networks, advertise, screen and approve clients, and schedule appointments. SESTA/FOSTA shut these resources down, effectively making sex work more dangerous.

The supposed purpose of SESTA/FOSTA is to put a stop to online human trafficking. However, law enforcement actually relies on online platforms for evidence when investigating trafficking cases. By censoring certain language from the internet, SESTA/FOSTA scrubs away leads and evidence, making it easier for cases of human trafficking to go undetected.

Those challenging the bill argue it does not provide a specific enough description of what it means to “promote prostitution” or even who could be charged with owning, managing, or operating an interactive computer service, thus leaving it unclear what specific actions are being criminalized. The basis of their argument is that SESTA/FOSTA’s overly broad language violates the First Amendment requirement that restrictions of speech must be narrowly specific. The plaintiffs also argue that this vagueness violates the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause, which forbids the implementation of laws that do not reasonably define or explain the conduct that they make illegal.

Meanwhile, the main argument made by U.S. attorneys is that SESTA/FOSTA is simply an “aiding-and-abetting” statute intended to criminalize any individual who aids or abets another person engaging in prostitution. Yet the bill’s text never mentions either of these words.

This unclear use of language begs the question, what exactly does it mean to “promote” prostitution? Could the government hold the owner of a website liable for a post advocating for the decriminalization of sex work? Could this count as the promotion of prostitution?

The answer is unclear, which is why opponents of SESTA/FOSTA claim it is unconstitutional.

While the court’s final ruling can’t be predicted, decriminalization advocates agree that the events of the hearing appear encouraging.

When faced with the argument that SESTA/FOSTA is simply an aiding-and-abetting statute, Harry Edwards, a judge on the panel, said the following.

“In my mind, it's not an aiding-and-abetting law. We know how to write 'em when we want to. This doesn't look like anything that I understand to be an aiding-and-abetting law.”

SESTA/FOSTA has been actively harming sex workers for five years now. Should the court ultimately find SESTA/FOSTA unconstitutional, it will be a huge victory for human rights. Still, the judges won’t issue an official ruling for some time. Meanwhile, we must continue to defend the health and safety of sex workers by advocating for the full decriminalization of consensual adult sex work.

Audio of the full hearing is available here.

Last September, Decriminalize Sex Work (DSW) staff attorney Becca Cleary took the lead in authoring an Amicus Brief against SESTA/FOSTA, along with the support of eleven other organizations.

Visit DSW’s Take Action page to join the challenge against SESTA/FOSTA.

Image courtesy of @WoodhullFreedom on Twitter.

DSW Newsletter #44 (January 2023)

DSW Attends Adult Video News Awards in Las Vegas

January 7, 2023 Decriminalize Sex Work (DSW) attended the annual Adult Video News (AVN) Awards in Las Vegas earlier this month. The event recognizes achievements in various aspects of the creation...

Read More

DSW Attends Adult Video News Awards in Las Vegas

California Repeals Anti-Prostitution Loitering Law

January 1, 2023 SB 357, otherwise known as the Safer Streets for All Act, has officially gone into effect in California. The bill repealed California Penal Code § 653.22, which criminalized the...

Read More

California Repeals Anti-Prostitution Loitering Law

United States Appeals Court Hears Arguments Against SESTA/FOSTA

January 11, 2023 The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA) and Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) have harmed victims of trafficking, the very individuals they were meant to protect, along...

Read More

United States Appeals Court Hears Arguments Against SESTA/FOSTA

DSW and Allies Celebrate START Act Anniversary

January 20, 2023 On January 20, Decriminalize Sex Work (DSW) gathered with allies from the New York Anti-Trafficking Network (NYATN) to celebrate the one year anniversary of the Survivors of Trafficking...

Read More

DSW and Allies Celebrate START Act Anniversary

DSW Newsletter Archive

California Repeals Anti-Prostitution Loitering Law

January 1, 2023

SB 357, otherwise known as the Safer Streets for All Act, has officially gone into effect in California. The bill repealed California Penal Code § 653.22, which criminalized the act of loitering with “intent to commit prostitution.”

Archaic anti-sex work loitering laws are common around the United States.

What is Loitering for the Purpose of Prostitution?

Loitering for the purpose of prostitution (LPP) laws exist in multiple states across the U.S. They make wandering, remaining, or spending time in a public space with the “intent to promote or commit prostitution” a crime. Behavior indicative of this “intent” can include beckoning or attempting to speak to passing pedestrians and motorists, but a 2019 study conducted through the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s office found that under California’s LPP law, other causes for arrest typically included an individual’s presence in an area known for sex work, their clothing, possession of a cell phone, possession of cash, or reacting to the presence of police.

These types of laws are discriminatory by nature, as they encourage law enforcement to profile and arrest individuals based on their race, gender, and/or stereotypes of what a sex worker looks like. By criminalizing intent, rather than action, LPP laws allow police to enforce violations at their own biased discretion, which threatens equal prosecution under the law.

Who do LPP laws affect?

Unsurprisingly, LPP laws are used to target marginalized groups, especially transgender women of color. The Sylvia Rivera Law Project, based in New York City, found that 80% of their clients who identified as transgender women of color had experienced police harassment or false arrest based on suspicion of prostitution.

According to the ACLU, black adults made up over 50% of individuals arrested in Los Angeles under California’s LPP law, despite only representing 8.95% of the city’s population.

Senator Scott Wiener, author of SB 357, denounced California’s LPP law in a Tweet last year, stating the following:

“An officer can arrest someone based on how they look. Arrests target trans women/women of color.”

Roxanne, a transgender San Jose attorney who goes only by her first name, lived this experience herself. In July 2019, she was out for a walk in her neighborhood when law enforcement approached and arrested her without explanation.

They processed her at Santa Clara County jail, where officers denied her request to be held with other transgender women and instead booked her as a man. It wasn’t until the next morning, after being held in a filthy cell and ridiculed by jail staff all night, that she learned what her charges were: Loitering with intent to commit prostitution.

Roxanne has stated that she’s used to being harassed by police. In an  interview with Mercury News, she said:

“The jailing was new, but the harassment is routine. A lot of our community faces the same thing, and we need to stand together and stop this. You shouldn’t be harassed just on your appearance.”

What does SB 357 mean for California?

SB 357 is a huge victory against discrimination in California and comes as the latest in a series of victories for sex worker rights.

In 2013, California changed its victim compensation laws, which previously excluded sex workers. Now, sex workers who are sexually or physically assaulted have the right to receive money from a victim compensation fund.

In 2016, the state passed SB 1322, which barred law enforcement from arresting minors for sex work-related offenses.

In 2019, SB 233 repealed the practice of using condoms as evidence of prostitution and gave individuals the power to report a crime without being prosecuted for sex work or drug use.

Together, these laws have been monumental in the movement to prioritize the health and safety of sex workers across California.

Laws like these pave the way for the eventual decriminalization of consensual adult sex work.

Loitering for the Purposes of Prostitution

SB 357 officially goes into effect, repealing “Loitering for the Purpose of Prostitution” laws in California.

DSW Newsletter #44 (January 2023)

DSW Attends Adult Video News Awards in Las Vegas

January 7, 2023 Decriminalize Sex Work (DSW) attended the annual Adult Video News (AVN) Awards in Las Vegas earlier this month. The event recognizes achievements in various aspects of the creation...

Read More

DSW Attends Adult Video News Awards in Las Vegas

California Repeals Anti-Prostitution Loitering Law

January 1, 2023 SB 357, otherwise known as the Safer Streets for All Act, has officially gone into effect in California. The bill repealed California Penal Code § 653.22, which criminalized the...

Read More

California Repeals Anti-Prostitution Loitering Law

United States Appeals Court Hears Arguments Against SESTA/FOSTA

January 11, 2023 The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA) and Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) have harmed victims of trafficking, the very individuals they were meant to protect, along...

Read More

United States Appeals Court Hears Arguments Against SESTA/FOSTA

DSW and Allies Celebrate START Act Anniversary

January 20, 2023 On January 20, Decriminalize Sex Work (DSW) gathered with allies from the New York Anti-Trafficking Network (NYATN) to celebrate the one year anniversary of the Survivors of Trafficking...

Read More

DSW and Allies Celebrate START Act Anniversary

DSW Newsletter Archive